Edition Masquer
Contra Celsum

32.

Προείρηται δ' ἡμῖν ὅτι οὔτ' ἀλαζὼν οὔτε γόης δύναται εἶναι ὁ Ἰησοῦς· διὸ οὐκ ἀναγκαῖον ἐπαναλαμβάνειν τὰ εἰρημένα, ἵνα μὴ πρὸς τὰς ταυτολογίας Κέλσου καὶ ἡμεῖς ταυτολογῶμεν. Ἐγκαλῶν δὲ τῇ γενεαλογίᾳ τὰ μὲν καὶ παρὰ Χριστιανοῖς ζητούμενα καὶ ὑπό τινων ὡς ἐγκλήματα προσαγόμενα τῇ διαφωνίᾳ τῶν γενεαλογιῶν οὐδαμῶς ὠνόμασεν. Οὐ γὰρ ᾔδει ὁ ὡς ἀληθῶς ἀλαζὼν Κέλσος καὶ ἐπαγγελλόμενος εἰδέναι πάντα τὰ Χριστιανῶν φρονίμως ἐπαπορῆσαι τῇ γραφῇ. Φησὶ δὲ ἀπηυθαδῆσθαι τοὺς γενεαλογήσαντας ἀπὸ τοῦ πρώτου φύντος καὶ τῶν ἐν Ἰουδαίοις βασιλέων τὸν Ἰησοῦν. Καὶ οἴεταί τι εἰσφέρειν γενναῖον, ὅτι οὐκ ἂν ἡ τοῦ τέκτονος γυνὴ τηλικούτου γένους τυγχάνουσα ἠγνόει. Τί γὰρ τοῦτο πρὸς τὸν λόγον; Ἔστω ὅτι οὐκ ἠγνόει· τί λυπεῖ τὰ προκείμενα; Ἀλλὰ ἀγνοείτω· πόθεν, ὅτι ἠγνόει, οὐκ ἦν ἀπὸ τοῦ πρώτου ἀνθρώπου καὶ οὐκ ἀνήγετο αὐτῆς τὸ γένος ἐπὶ τοὺς ἐν Ἰουδαίοις βασιλεύσαντας; Ἢ ἀναγκαῖον οἴεται ὁ Κέλσος τοὺς πενεστέρους ἐκ πάντων πενεστέρων προγόνων γεγονέναι ἢ τοὺς βασιλεῖς ἐκ βασιλέων; Διατρίβειν οὖν περὶ τὸν λόγον δοκεῖ μοι εἶναι μάταιον, φανεροῦ ὄντος ὅτι καὶ κατὰ τοὺς ἡμετέρους χρόνους ἐκ πλουσίων καὶ ἐνδόξων γεγόνασί τινες τῆς Μαρίας πενέστεροι καὶ ἐξ ἀσημοτάτων ἡγούμενοι ἐθνῶν καὶ βασιλεῖς.

Traduction Masquer
Origen Against Celsus

Chapter XXXII.

We have already shown that Jesus can be regarded neither as an arrogant man, nor a sorcerer; and therefore it is unnecessary to repeat our former arguments, lest, in replying to the tautologies of Celsus, we ourselves should be guilty of needless repetition. And now, in finding fault with our Lord's genealogy, there are certain points which occasion some difficulty even to Christians, and which, owing to the discrepancy between the genealogies, are advanced by some as arguments against their correctness, but which Celsus has not even mentioned. For Celsus, who is truly a braggart, and who professes to be acquainted with all matters relating to Christianity, does not know how to raise doubts in a skilful manner against the credibility of Scripture. But he asserts that the "framers of the genealogies, from a feeling of pride, made Jesus to be descended from the first man, and from the kings of the Jews." And he thinks that he makes a notable charge when he adds, that "the carpenters wife could not have been ignorant of the fact, had she been of such illustrious descent." But what has this to do with the question? Granted that she was not ignorant of her descent, how does that affect the result? Suppose that she were ignorant, how could her ignorance prove that she was not descended from the first man, or could not derive her origin from the Jewish kings? Does Celsus imagine that the poor must always be descended from ancestors who are poor, or that kings are always born of kings? But it appears folly to waste time upon such an argument as this, seeing it is well known that, even in our own days, some who are poorer than Mary are descended from ancestors of wealth and distinction, and that rulers of nations and kings have sprung from persons of no reputation.