18.
Much more then did Peter say this without meaning that the Essence of the Word was a work; for he knew Him to be God’s Son, confessing, ‘Thou art the Christ, the Son of the Living God 1;’ but he meant His Kingdom and Lordship which was formed and came to be according to grace, and was relatively to us. For while saying this, he was not silent about the Son of God’s everlasting Godhead which is the Father’s; but He had said already, that He had poured the Spirit on us; now to give the Spirit with authority, is not in the power of creature or work, but the Spirit is God’s Gift 2. For the creatures are hallowed by the Holy Spirit; but the Son, in that He is not hallowed by the Spirit, but on the contrary Himself the Giver of it to all 3, is therefore no creature, but true Son of the Father. And yet He who gives the Spirit, the same is said also to be made; that is, to be made among us Lord because of His manhood, while giving the Spirit because He is God’s Word. For He ever was and is, as Son, so also Lord and Sovereign of all, being like in all things 4 to the Father, and having all that is the Father’s 5 as He Himself has said 6.
Chapter XVI .— Introductory to Proverbs viii. 22 , that the Son is not a Creature .Arian formula, a creature but not as one of the creatures; but each creature is unlike all other creatures; and no creature can create. The Word then differs from all creatures in that in which they, though otherwise differing, all agree together, as creatures; viz. in being an efficient cause; in being the one medium or instrumental agent in creation; moreover in being the revealer of the Father; and in being the object of worship.
18 (continued). Now in the next place let us consider the passage in the Proverbs, ‘The Lord created me a beginning of His ways for His works 7;’ although in shewing that the Word is no work, it has been also shewn that He is no creature. For it is the same P. 358 to say work or creature, so that the proof that He is no work is a proof also that He is no creature. Whereas one may marvel at these men, thus devising excuses to be irreligious, and nothing daunted at the refutations which meet them upon every point. For first they set about deceiving the simple by their questions, 8‘Did He who is make from that which was not one that was not or one that was 9?’ and, ‘Had you a son before begetting him 10?’ And when this had been proved worthless, next they invented the question, ‘Is the Unoriginate one or two 11?’ Then, when in this they had been confuted, straightway they formed another, ‘Has He free-will and an alterable nature 12?’ But being forced to give up this, next they set about saying, ‘Being made so much better than the Angels 13;’ and when the truth exposed this pretence, now again, collecting them all together, they think to recommend their heresy by ‘work’ and ‘creature 14.’ For they mean those very things over again, and are true to their own perverseness, putting into various shapes and turning to and fro the same errors, if so be to deceive some by that variousness. Although then abundant proof has been given above of this their reckless expedient, yet, since they make all places sound with this passage from the Proverbs, and to many who are ignorant of the faith of Christians, seem to say somewhat, it is necessary to examine separately, ‘He created’ as well as ‘Who was faithful to Him that made Him 15;’ that, as in all others, so in this text also, they may be proved to have got no further than a fantasy.
-
Matt. xvi. 16 . ↩
-
θεοῦ δῶρον . And so more distinctly S. Basil, δῶρον τοῦ θεοῦ τὸ πνεῦμα .de Sp. S.57, and more frequently the later Latins, as in the Hymn, ‘Altissimi Donum Dei;’ and the earlier, e.g. Hil.de Trin.ii. 29. and August.Trin.xv. 29. v. 15, Petav.Trin.vii. 13, §20. ↩
-
Supr. ch. xii. ↩
-
ὅμοιος κατὰ παντα . vid. infr. §22, note 4. ↩
-
Vid. infr. note onOrat.iii. 1. ↩
-
Vid. John xvi. 15 ↩
-
Prov. viii. 22 . [This text, which had been immemorially applied to the Λόγος (supr.p. 168, note 7), and which in the false rendering of the LXX. strongly favoured the Arian side], is presently explained at greater length than any other of the texts he handles, forming the chief subject of the Oration henceforth, after an introduction which extends down to 44. ↩
-
From the methodical manner in which the successive portions of his foregoing Oration are here referred to, it would almost seem as if he were answering in course some Arian work. vid. alsosupr. Orat.i. 37, 53.infr. Orat.iii. 26. He does not seem to be tracing the controversy historically. ↩
-
Supr. ch. vii. ↩
-
Ch. viii. ↩
-
Ch. ix. ↩
-
Ch. x. ↩
-
Ch. xiii. ↩
-
Ch. xiv. and xv. ↩
-
Ch. xiv. Heb. iii. 2 ↩