• Home
  • Works
  • Introduction Guide Collaboration Sponsors / Collaborators Copyrights Contact Imprint
Bibliothek der Kirchenväter
Search
DE EN FR
Works Tertullian (160-220) Adversus Hermogenem

Edition Hide
Adversus Hermogenem

XIII.

[1] Et quaeretur, quomodo ex ea bona facta sint, quae ex demutatione nullo modo facta sunt. Unde in mala ac pessima boni atque optimi semen? Certe nec bona arbor fructus malos edit, quia nec deus nisi bonus, nec mala arbor bonos, quia nec materia est pessima. [2] Aut si dabimus illi aliquid etiam boni germinis, iam non erit uniformis naturae, id est malae in totum, sed iam tum duplex, id est malae et bonae naturae, et quaeretur iterum an in bono et malo potuerit conuenire, luci et tenebris, dulci et amaro. [3] Aut si potuit utriusque diuersitas, boni et mali, concurrisse et duplex natura fuisse materiae, amborum ferax fructuum, iam nec bona ipsa deo deputabuntur, ut nec mala illi inputentur, sed utraque species de materiae proprietate sumpta ad materiam pertinebit. Quo pacto neque gratiam bonorum deo debebimus nec inuidiam malorum, quia nihil de suo operatus ingenio; per quod probabitur manifeste materiae deseruisse.

Translation Hide
Against Hermogenes

Chapter XIII.--Another Ground of Hermogenes that Matter Has Some Good in It. Its Absurdity.

Here the question will arise How creatures were made good out of it, 1 which were formed without any change at all? 2 How occurs the seed of what is good, nay, very good, in that which is evil, nay, very evil? Surely a good tree does not produce evil fruit, 3 since there is no God who is not good; nor does an evil tree yield good fruit, since there is not Matter except what is very evil. Or if we were to grant him that there is some germ of good in it, then there will be no longer a uniform nature (pervading it), that is to say, one which is evil throughout; but instead thereof (we now encounter) a double nature, partly good and partly evil; and again the question will arise, whether, in a subject which is good and evil, there could possibly have been found a harmony for light and darkness, for sweet and bitter? So again, if qualities so utterly diverse as good and evil have been able to unite together, 4 and have imparted to Matter a double nature, productive of both kinds of fruit, then no longer will absolutely 5 good things be imputable to God, just as evil things are not ascribed to Him, but both qualities will appertain to Matter, since they are derived from the property of Matter. At this rate, we shall owe to God neither gratitude for good things, nor grudge 6 for evil ones, because He has produced no work of His own proper character. 7 From which circumstance will arise the clear proof that He has been subservient to Matter.


  1. Matter. ↩

  2. i.e. in their nature, Matter being evil, and they good, on the hypothesis. ↩

  3. Matt. vii. 18. ↩

  4. Concurrisse. ↩

  5. Ipsa. ↩

  6. Invidiam. ↩

  7. Ingenio. ↩

  Print   Report an error
  • Show the text
  • Bibliographic Reference
  • Scans for this version
Editions of this Work
Adversus Hermogenem
Translations of this Work
Against Hermogenes
Contre Hermogène Compare
Gegen Hermogenes. (BKV) Compare

Contents

Faculty of Theology, Patristics and History of the Early Church
Miséricorde, Av. Europe 20, CH 1700 Fribourg

© 2025 Gregor Emmenegger
Imprint
Privacy policy