Traduction
Masquer
The Confessions of St. Augustin In Thirteen Books
Chapter XIV.--Neither Time Past Nor Future, But the Present Only, Really is.
17. At no time, therefore, hadst Thou not made anything, because Thou hadst made time itself. And no times are co-eternal with Thee, because Thou remainest for ever; but should these continue, they would not be times. For what is time? Who can easily and briefly explain it? Who even in thought can comprehend it, even to the pronouncing of a word concerning it? But what in speaking do we refer to more familiarly and knowingly than time? And certainly we understand when we speak of it; we understand also when we hear it spoken of by another. What, then, is time? If no one ask of me, I know; if I wish to explain to him who asks, I know not. Yet I say with confidence, that I know that if nothing passed away, there would not be past time; and if nothing were coming, there would not be future time; and if nothing were, there would not be present time. Those two times, therefore, past and future, how are they, when even the past now is not; and the future is not as yet? But should the present be always present, and should it not pass into time past, time truly it could not be, but eternity. If, then, time present--if it be time--only comes into existence because it passes into time past, how do we say that even this is, whose cause of being is that it shall not be--namely, so that we cannot truly say that time is, unless because it tends not to be?
Edition
Masquer
Confessiones (PL)
CAPUT XIV. Temporis differentiae tres.
17. Nullo ergo tempore non feceras aliquid, quia ipsum tempus tu feceras. Et nulla tempora tibi coaeterna [Col. 0816] sunt, quia tu permanes: at illa si permanerent, non essent tempora. Quid enim est tempus? Quis hoc facile breviterque explicaverit? Quis hoc, ad verbum de illo proferendum, vel cogitatione comprehenderit? Quid autem familiarius et notius in loquendo commemoramus quam tempus? Et intelligimus utique cum id loquimur, intelligimus etiam cum alio loquente id audimus. Quid est ergo tempus? Si nemo ex me quaerat, scio; si quaerenti explicare velim, nescio: fidenter tamen dico scire me, quod si nihil praeteriret, non esset praeteritum tempus; et si nihil adveniret, non esset futurum tempus; et si nihil esset, non esset praesens tempus. Duo ergo illa tempora, praeteritum et futurum quomodo sunt, quando et praeteritum jam non est, et futurum nondum est? Praesens autem si semper esset praesens, nec in praeteritum transiret; jam non esset tempus, sed aeternitas. Si ergo praesens, ut tempus sit, ideo fit quia in praeteritum transit; quomodo et hoc esse dicimus, cui causa ut sit illa est, quia non erit; ut scilicet non vere dicamus tempus esse, nisi quia tendit non esse.