Edition ausblenden
Contra Faustum Manichaeum libri triginta tres

82.

Nunc ergo iam pertractatis personis omnibus, per quas Faustus putavit scripturas veteris testamenti esse culpandas, redditoque suo cuique sermone congruo, quo vel defensi sunt homines dei adversus haereticorum carnaliumque calumnias vel reprehensis hominibus tamen scriptura laudabilis venerabilisque monstrata est, p. 684,4 videamus deinceps ex ordine, quo eos homines Faustus accusando commemoravit, quid etiam significent ipsa facta hominum, quid prophetiae gerant, quae futura praenuntient; quod iam fecimus de Abraham et Isaac et Iacob, quorum se deus ita dici voluit, tamquam solorum esset deus, qui deus est universae creaturae, non frustra utique tantum eis tribuens honorem, nisi quia noverat in eis, quod solus etiam perfecte summeque nosse poterat, sinceram praecipuamque caritatem, et quia in eis tribus patribus quodam modo consummavit magnum ac mirabile sacramentum futuri populi sui, p. 684,14 quod per liberas genuerunt non solum in libertatem, sicut per Saram et Rebeccam et Liam et Rachel, verum etiam in servitutem, sicut per eandem Rebeccam natus est Esau, cui dictum est: Eris servus fratris tui, et per ancillas non solum in servitutem, sicut per Agar, verum etiam in libertatem, sicut per Balam et Zelpham. Ita enim et in populo dei et per spiritales liberos nascuntur non solum in laudabilem libertatem, quemadmodum illi, quibus dicitur imitatores mei estote sicut et ego Christi, verum etiam in damnabilem servitutem, sicut per Philippum Simon et per carnales servos nascuntur non solum in damnabilem servitutem, qui eos imitantur, verum etiam in laudabilem libertatem, quibus dicitur: Quae dicunt facite; quae autem faciunt facere nolite. p. 685,1 Hoc magnum sacramentum quisquis in dei populo prudenter agnoverit, unitatem spiritus in vinculo pacis usque in finem quibusdam cohaerendo, quosdam tolerando custodit. Fecimus hoc et de Loth, quid eius laudandum, quid culpandum scriptura narraverit, quid intellegendum de tota illa re gesta significaverit, demonstrantes.

Übersetzung ausblenden
Reply to Faustus the Manichaean

82.

Having now gone over all the cases in which Faustus finds fault with the Old Testament, and having attended to the merit of each, either defending men of God against the calumnies of carnal heretics, or, where the men were at fault, showing the excellence and the majesty of Scripture, let us again take the cases in the order of Faustus' accusations, and see the meaning of the actions recorded, what they typify, and what they foretell. This we have already done in the case of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, of whom God said that He was their God, as if the God of universal nature were the God of none besides them; not honoring them with an unmeaning title, but because He, who could alone have a full and perfect knowledge, knew the sincere and remarkable charity of these men; and because these three patriarchs united formed a notable type of the future people of God, in not only having free children by free women, as by Sarah, and Rebecca, and Leah, and Rachel, but also bond children, as of this same Rebecca was born Esau, to whom it was said, "Thou shalt serve thy brother;" ¹ and in having by bond women not only bond children, as by Hagar, but also free children, as by Bilhah and Zilphah. Thus also in the people of God, those spiritually free not only have children born into the enjoyment of liberty, like those to whom it is said, "Be ye followers of me, as I also am of Christ," ² but they have also children born into guilty bondage, as Simon was born of Philip. ³ Again, from carnal bondmen are born not only children of guilty bondage, who imitate them, but also children of happy liberty, to whom it is said, "What they say, do; but do not after their works." ⁴ Whoever rightly observes the fulfillment of this type in the people of God, keeps the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace, by continuing to the end in union with some, and in patient endurance of others. Of Lot, also, we have already spoken, and have shown what the Scripture mentions as praiseworthy in him, and what as blameworthy and the meaning of the whole narrative.