Edition
Hide
Contra Celsum
55.
Μέμνημαι δέ ποτε ἔν τινι πρὸς τοὺς λεγομένους παρὰ Ἰουδαίοις σοφοὺς ζητήσει ταῖς προφητείαις ταύταις χρησάμενος, ἐφ' οἷς ἔλεγεν ὁ Ἰουδαῖος ταῦτα πεπροφητεῦσθαι ὡς περὶ ἑνὸς τοῦ ὅλου λαοῦ, καὶ γενομένου ἐν τῇ διασπορᾷ καὶ πληγέντος, ἵνα πολλοὶ προσήλυτοι γένωνται τῇ προφάσει τοῦ ἐπεσπάρθαι Ἰουδαίους τοῖς λοιποῖς ἔθνεσι. Καὶ οὕτω διηγεῖτο τὸ «Ἀδοξήσει ἀπὸ ἀνθρώπων τὸ εἶδός σου» καὶ τὸ «Οἷς οὐκ ἀνηγγέλη περὶ αὐτοῦ ὄψονται» καὶ τὸ «Ἄνθρωπος ἐν πληγῇ ὤν.» Πολλὰ μὲν οὖν τότ' ἐν τῇ ζητήσει λέλεκται τὰ ἐλέγχοντα ὅτι περί τινος ἑνὸς ταῦτα προφητευόμενα οὐκ εὐλόγως ἐκεῖνοι ἀνάγουσιν ἐπὶ ὅλον τὸν] λαόν. Ἐπυνθανόμην δέ, τίνος ἂν εἴη πρόσωπον τὸ λέγον· «Οὗτος τὰς ἁμαρτίας ἡμῶν φέρει καὶ περὶ ἡμῶν ὀδυνᾶται» καὶ τό· «Αὐτὸς δὲ ἐτραυματίσθη διὰ τὰς ἁμαρτίας ἡμῶν, καὶ μεμαλάκισται διὰ τὰς ἀνομίας ἡμῶν», καὶ τίνος πρόσωπον ἦν τὸ φάσκον· «Τῷ μώλωπι αὐτοῦ ἡμεῖς ἰάθημεν.» Σαφῶς γὰρ οἱ ἐν ταῖς ἁμαρτίαις γενόμενοι καὶ ἰαθέντες ἐκ τοῦ τὸν σωτῆρα πεπονθέναι, εἴτ' ἀπὸ τοῦ λαοῦ ἐκείνου εἴτε καὶ οἱ ἀπὸ τῶν ἐθνῶν, [ταῦτα λέγουσι παρὰ τῷ προφήτῃ προεωρακότι καὶ ἀπὸ τοῦ ἁγίου πνεύματος ταῦτα προσωποποιήσαντι. Μάλιστα δ' ἐδόξαμεν θλίβειν ἀπὸ τῆς φασκούσης λέξεως τό· «Ἀπὸ τῶν ἀνομιῶν τοῦ λαοῦ μου ἤχθη εἰς θάνατον.» Εἰ γὰρ ὁ λαὸς κατ' ἐκείνους εἰσὶν οἱ προφητευόμενοι, πῶς «ἀπὸ τῶν ἀνομιῶν τοῦ λαοῦ» τοῦ θεοῦ λέγεται ἦχθαι «εἰς θάνατον» οὗτος, εἰ μὴ ἕτερος ὢν παρὰ τὸν λαὸν τοῦ θεοῦ; Τίς δ' οὗτος, εἰ μὴ Ἰησοῦς Χριστός, οὗ «τῷ μώλωπι» «ἰάθημεν» οἱ εἰς αὐτὸν πιστεύοντες, ἀπεκδυσαμένου «τὰς» ἐν ἡμῖν «ἀρχὰς καὶ ἐξουσίας» καὶ «παρρησίᾳ» δειγματίσαντος αὐτὰς ἐν τῷ ξύλῳ.] Ἕκαστον δὲ τῶν ἐν τῇ προφητείᾳ σαφηνίσαι καὶ μηδὲν ἀβασάνιστον αὐτῶν παραλιπεῖν ἄλλου καιροῦ ἐστι. Καὶ ταῦτα δ' ἐπὶ πλεῖον εἴρηται, ὡς νομίζω, ἀναγκαίως διὰ τὴν ἐκκειμένην τοῦ παρὰ τῷ Κέλσῳ Ἰουδαίου λέξιν.
Translation
Hide
Origen Against Celsus
Chapter LV.
Now I remember that, on one occasion, at a disputation held with certain Jews, who were reckoned wise men, I quoted these prophecies; to which my Jewish opponent replied, that these predictions bore reference to the whole people, regarded as one individual, and as being in a state of dispersion and suffering, in order that many proselytes might be gained, on account of the dispersion of the Jews among numerous heathen nations. And in this way he explained the words, "Thy form shall be of no reputation among men;" and then, "They to whom no message was sent respecting him shall see;" and the expression, "A man under suffering." Many arguments were employed on that occasion during the discussion to prove that these predictions regarding one particular person were not rightly applied by them to the whole nation. And I asked to what character the expression would be appropriate, "This man bears our sins, and suffers pain on our behalf;" and this, "But He was wounded for our sins, and bruised for our iniquities;" and to whom the expression properly belonged, "By His stripes were we healed." For it is manifest that it is they who had been sinners, and had been healed by the Saviour's sufferings (whether belonging to the Jewish nation or converts from the Gentiles), who use such language in the writings of the prophet who foresaw these events, and who, under the influence of the Holy Spirit, applied these words to a person. But we seemed to press them hardest with the expression, "Because of the iniquities of My people was He led away unto death." For if the people, according to them, are the subject of the prophecy, how is the man said to be led away to death because of the iniquities of the people of God, unless he be a different person from that people of God? And who is this person save Jesus Christ, by whose stripes they who believe on Him are healed, when "He had spoiled the principalities and powers (that were over us), and had made a show of them openly on His cross?" 1 At another time we may explain the several parts of the prophecy, leaving none of them unexamined. But these matters have been treated at greater length, necessarily as I think, on account of the language of the Jew, as quoted in the work of Celsus.
-
[Col. ii. 15. S.] ↩