Translation
Hide
Histoire ecclésiastique
CHAPITRE XVIII : QUELS ÉCRITS DE JUSTIN SONT VENUS JUSQU'A NOUS
[1] Justin nous a laissé un grand nombre d'ouvrages, ils sont la preuve d'un esprit cultivé et zélé pour Tes choses divines et l'on n'en peut tirer que profit : nous y renverrons ceux qui aiment la science, après avoir indiqué ici, pour être utile, celles de ses œuvres qui sont venues à notre connaissance.
[2] D'abord, il y a de lui le discours adressé à Antonin surnommé le Pieux, ainsi qu'à ses fils et au sénat de Rome, en faveur de nos croyances; puis, celui qui contient une seconde apologie de notre foi et que Justin adressa au successeur et homonyme de l'empereur précédent, à Antoninus Verus, dont nous venons, à l'instant, de raconter ce qui concerne l'époque.1 [3] II y a encore le Discours aux Grecs, où l'auteur, après avoir examiné longuement beaucoup de questions agitées par nous et les philosophes grecs, disserte sur la nature des démons ; mais il n'y a pas d'urgence à en rien citer ici. [4] II nous est venu encore en autre écrit adressé aux Grecs, que Justin a intitulé Réfutation ; un ouvrage, De la monarchie de Dieu, qu'il établit non seulement d'après nos Ecritures, mais aussi d'après les livres des Grecs ; [5] un écrit intitulé Psalmiste ; une autre œuvre, en forme de scolies, De l'âme, dans 461 laquelle, développant diverses questions qui se rapportent à ce sujet, il donne les opinions des philosophes grecs ; puis, il promet de les contredire et d'expliquer son propre sentiment dans un autre livre. [6] Il composa encore le Dialogue contre les Juifs, où il raconte la discussion qu'il eut à Éphèse avec Tryphon, le plus célèbre israélite de l'époque. Il y montre de quelle manière la grâce divine le poussa vers la doctrine de la foi, avec quel zèle il s'était auparavant adonné à l'étude de la philosophie et quelle ardente recherche il avait faite de la vérité. [7] En ce qui regarde les Juifs, il raconte, dans le même ouvrage, comment ils ont suscité toutes sortes d'obstacles à l'enseignement du Christ, et il s'adresse à Tryphon en ces termes :
« Non seulement vous n'avez pas changé de sentiment en ce qui concerne vos méfaits d'autrefois, mais en ce temps là, vous avez fait choix d'hommes spéciaux que vous avez envoyés de Jérusalem dans toute la terre pour dire qu'il venait de paraître une hérésie athée, celle de chrétiens. Ce sont eux qui ont répété tout ce que débitent contre nous tous ceux qui nous ignorent; en sorte que vous êtes coupables d'injustice non seulement envers vous, mais bel et bien envers tous les hommes. »2
[8] Justin écrit en outre que de son temps encore les dons de prophétie brillaient dans l'Eglise et il fait aussi mention de l'Apocalypse de Jean, disant clairement qu'elle est de l'apôtre. Il cite certaines paroles des prophètes, et convainc Tryphon que les Juifs les ont retranchées de l'Écriture. Bien d'autres travaux de Jus- 453 tin sont encore entre les mains de beaucoup de chrétiens. [9] Les écrits de cet homme ont paru aux anciens eux-mêmes tellement dignes d'estime qu'Irénée en cite des passages. Ainsi d'abord, dans le quatrième livre contre les hérésies, il dit :
« Et c'est avec raison que Justin déclare, dans son ouvrage contre Marcion, qu'il ne serait pas même convaincu par le Seigneur lui-même, s'il l'entendait dire qu'il y a un autre Dieu que le créateur du monde. »
Puis, au cinquième livre du même ouvrage :
« Et Justin observe fort bien qu'avant la venue du Sauveur, Satan n'a jamais osé blasphémer Dieu, parce qu'il ne savait pas encore sa condamnation. »
[10] Ceci était nécessaire à dire pour encourager ceux qui aiment la science à fréquenter avec soin les ouvrages de cet écrivain. Voilà ce qui concerne Justin.
Translation
Hide
The Church History of Eusebius
Chapter XVIII.--The Works of Justin which have come down to us.
1. This writer has left us a great many monuments of a mind educated and practiced in divine things, which are replete with profitable matter of every kind. To them we shall refer the studious, noting as we proceed those that have come to our knowledge. 1
2. There is a certain discourse 2 of his in defense of our doctrine addressed to Antoninus surnamed the Pious, and to his sons, and to the Roman senate. Another work contains his second Apology 3 in behalf of our faith, which he offered to him who was the successor of the emperor mentioned and who bore the same name, Antoninus Verus, the one whose times we are now recording.
3. Also another work against the Greeks, 4 in which he discourses at length upon most of the questions at issue between us and the Greek philosophers, and discusses the nature of demons. It is not necessary for me to add any of these things here.
4. And still another work of his against the Greeks has come down to us, to which he gave the title Refutation. And besides these another, On the Sovereignty of God, 5 which he establishes not only from our Scriptures, but also from the books of the Greeks.
5. Still further, a work entitled Psaltes, 6 and another disputation On the Soul, in which, after propounding various questions concerning the problem under discussion, he gives the opinions of the Greek philosophers, promising to refute it, and to present his own view in another work.
6. He composed also a dialogue against the Jews, 7 which he held in the city of Ephesus with Trypho, a most distinguished man among the Hebrews of that day. In it he shows how the divine grace urged him on to the doctrine of the faith, and with what earnestness he had formerly pursued philosophical studies, and how ardent a search he had made for the truth. 8
7. And he records of the Jews in the same work, that they were plotting against the teaching of Christ, asserting the same things against Trypho: "Not only did you not repent of the wickedness which you had committed, but you selected at that time chosen men, and you sent them out from Jerusalem through all the land, to announce that the godless heresy of the Christians had made its appearance, and to accuse them of those things which all that are ignorant of us say against us, so that you become the causes not only of your own injustice, but also of all other men's." 9
8. He writes also that even down to his time prophetic gifts shone in the Church. 10 And he mentions the Apocalypse of John, saying distinctly that it was the apostle's. 11 He also refers to certain prophetic declarations, and accuses Trypho on the ground that the Jews had cut them out of the Scripture. 12 A great many other works of his are still in the hands of many of the brethren. 13
9. And the discourses of the man were thought so worthy of study even by the ancients, that Irenaeus quotes his words: for instance, in the fourth book of his work Against Heresies, where he writes as follows: 14 "And Justin well says in his work against Marcion, that he would not have believed the Lord himself if he had preached another God besides the Creator"; and again in the fifth book of the same work he says: 15 "And Justin well said that before the coming of the Lord Satan never dared to blaspheme God, 16 because he did not yet know his condemnation."
10. These things I have deemed it necessary to say for the sake of stimulating the studious to peruse his works with diligence. So much concerning him.
-
Eusebius apparently cites here only the works which he had himself seen, which accounts for his omission of the work against Marcion mentioned above, in chap. 11. ↩
-
This Apology is the genuine work of Justin, and is still extant in two late and very faulty mss., in which it is divided into two, and the parts are commonly known as Justin's First and Second Apologies, though they were originally one. The best edition of the original is that of Otto in his Corpus Apologetarum Christianorum; English translation in the Ante-Nicene Fathers, Vol. I. p. 163 ff. Eusebius, in his Chronicle, places the date of its composition as 141, but most critics are now agreed in putting it ten or more years later; it must, however, have been written before the death of Antoninus Pius (161). See Schaff, Ch. Hist. II. p. 716. ↩
-
Eusebius here, as in chap. 16 above, ascribes to Justin a second Apology, from which, however, he nowhere quotes. From Eusebius the tradition has come down through history that Justin wrote two apologies, and the tradition seems to be confirmed by the existing mss. of Justin, which give two. But Eusebius' two cannot have corresponded to the present two; for, from chap. 8, §§16 and 17, it is plain that to Eusebius our two formed one complete work. And it is plain, too, from internal evidence (as is now very generally admitted; Wieseler's arguments against this, in his Christenverfolgungen, p. 104 ff., are not sound), that the two were originally one, our second forming simply a supplement to the first. What, then, has become of the second Apology mentioned by Eusebius? There is much difference of opinion upon this point. But the explanation given by Harnack (p. 171 ff.) seems the most probable one. According to his theory, the Apology of Athenagoras (of whom none of the Fathers, except Methodius and Philip of Side, seem to have had any knowledge) was attributed to Justin by a copyist of the third century,--who altered the address so as to throw it into Justin's time,--and as such it came into the hands of Eusebius, who mentions it among the works of Justin. That he does not quote from it may be due to the fact that it contained nothing suited to his purpose, or it is possible that he had some suspicions about it; the last, however, is not probable, as he nowhere hints at them. That some uncertainty, however, seemed to hang about the work is evident. The erasure of the name of Athenagoras and the substitution of Justin's name accounts for the almost total disappearance of the former from history. This Apology and his treatise on the resurrection first appear again under his name in the eleventh century, and exist now in seventeen mss. (see Schaff, II. 731). The traditional second Apology of Justin having thus after the eleventh century disappeared, his one genuine Apology was divided by later copyists, so that we still have apparently two separate apologies. ↩
-
This and the following were possibly genuine works of Justin; but, as they are no longer extant, it is impossible to speak with certainty. The two extant works, Discourse to the Greeks (Oratio ad Graecos) and Hortatory Address to the Greeks (Cohortatio ad Graecos), which are translated in the Ante-Nicene Fathers, I. p. 271-289, are to be regarded as the productions of later writers, and are not to be identified with the two mentioned here (although Otto defends them both, and Semisch defends the latter). ↩
-
We have no reason to think that this work was not genuine, but it is no longer extant, and therefore certainty in the matter is impossible. It is not to be identified with the extant work upon the same subject (translated in the Ante-Nicene Fathers, I. p. 290-293), which is the production of a later writer. ↩
-
This work and the following have entirely disappeared, but were genuine productions of Justin, for all that we know to the contrary. ↩
-
This is a genuine work of Justin, and is still extant (translated in the Ante-Nicene Fathers, I. p. 194-270). Its exact date is uncertain, but it was written after the Apology (to which it refers in chap. 120), and during the reign of Antoninus Pius (137-161). Of Trypho, whom Eusebius characterizes as "a most distinguished man among the Hebrews," we know nothing beyond what we can gather from the dialogue itself. ↩
-
See Dial. chap. 2 sq. ↩
-
ibid. chap. 17. ↩
-
ibid.chap. 82. ↩
-
ibid.chap. 81. ↩
-
ibid.chap. 71. ↩
-
Of the many extant and non-extant works attributed to Justin by tradition, all, or the most of them (except the seven mentioned by Eusebius, and the work Against Marcion, quoted by Irenaeus,--see just below,--and the Syntagma Contra omnes Haer.), are the productions of later writers. ↩
-
Irenaeus, Adv. Haer. IV. 6. 2. ↩
-
Irenaeus, V. 26. 2. Irenaeus does not name the work which he quotes here, and the quotation occurs in none of Justin's extant works, but the context and the sense of the quotation itself seem to point to the same work, Against Marcion. ↩
-
Epiphanius expresses the same thought in his Haer. XXXIX. 9. ↩