Edition Masquer
Contra Celsum

68.

Ἴδωμεν δὲ τίνα τρόπον φησὶν ὁ παρὰ τῷ Κέλσῳ Ἰουδαῖος ὅτι εἰ δ' οὖν τό γε τοσοῦτον [ὤφειλεν εἰς ἐπίδειξιν] θεότητος, [ἀπὸ τοῦ σκόλοπος] γοῦν εὐθὺς [ἀφανὴς γενέσθαι.] Καὶ τοῦτο δὲ [δοκεῖ μοι ὅμοιον εἶναι τῷ λόγῳ τῶν ἀντιδιατασσόντων τῇ προνοίᾳ] καὶ διαγραφόντων ἑαυτοῖς ἕτερα παρὰ τὰ ὄντα [καὶ λεγόντων ὅτι βέλτιον ἦν, εἰ οὕτως εἶχεν ὁ κόσμος, ὡς διεγράψαμεν.] Ὅπου μὲν γὰρ δυνατὰ διαγράφουσιν, ἐλέγχονται [χείρονα ποιοῦντες τὸ ὅσον ἐφ' ἑαυτοῖς καὶ τῇ διαγραφῇ αὐτῶν τὸν κόσμον], ὅπου δὲ δοκοῦσι μὴ χείρονα ἀναζωγραφεῖν τῶν ὄντων, ἀποδείκνυνται τὰ τῇ φύσει ἀδύνατα βουλόμενοι· ὡς ἑκατέρως αὐτοὺς καταγελάστους εἶναι. Καὶ ἐνθάδε τοίνυν ὅτι μὲν οὐκ ἀδύνατον ἠξίωσεν τῇ θειοτέρᾳ φύσει, ἵν' ὅταν βούληται ἀφανὴς γένηται, καὶ αὐτόθεν μὲν δῆλον σαφὲς δὲ καὶ ἐκ τῶν γεγραμμένων περὶ αὐτοῦ τοῖς μὴ τινὰ μὲν τῶν γεγραμμένων προσιεμένοις, ἵνα κατηγορήσωσι τοῦ λόγου, τινὰ δὲ πλάσματα οἰομένοις τυγχάνειν. Γέγραπται δὲ ἐν τῷ κατὰ Λουκᾶν ὅτι μετὰ τὴν ἀνάστασιν «λαβὼν τὸν ἄρτον» ὁ Ἰησοῦς «εὐλόγησε καὶ κλάσας ἐπεδίδου» τῷ Σίμωνι καὶ τῷ Κλεόπᾳ· λαβόντων δ' αὐτῶν τὸν ἄρτον «διηνοίχθησαν αὐτῶν οἱ ὀφθαλμοί, καὶ ἐπέγνωσαν αὐτόν· καὶ αὐτὸς ἄφαντος ἐγένετο ἀπ' αὐτῶν».

Traduction Masquer
Origen Against Celsus

Chapter LXVIII.

But let us observe how this Jew of Celsus asserts that, "if this at least would have helped to manifest his divinity, he ought accordingly to have at once disappeared from the cross." Now this seems to me to be like the argument of those who oppose the doctrine of providence, and who arrange things differently from what they are, and allege that the world would be better if it were as they arrange it. Now, in those instances in which their arrangement is a possible one, they are proved to make the world, so far as depends upon them, worse by their arrangement than it actually is; while in those cases in which they do not portray things worse than they really are, they are shown to desire impossibilities; so that in either case they are deserving of ridicule. And here, accordingly, that there was no impossibility in His coming, as a being of diviner nature, in order to disappear when He chose, is clear from the very nature of the case; and is certain, moreover, from what is recorded of Him, in the judgment of those who do not adopt certain portions merely of the narrative that they may have ground for accusing Christianity, and who consider other portions to be fiction. For it is related in St. Luke's Gospel, that Jesus after His resurrection took bread, and blessed it, and breaking it, distributed it to Simon and Cleopas; and when they had received the bread, "their eyes were opened, and they knew Him, and He vanished out of their sight." ¹