Edition Masquer
Contra Faustum Manichaeum libri triginta tres

1.

p. 328,25 Faustus dixit: Cur non accipitis prophetas? Immo tu dic potius, si quid habes, cur debeamus prophetas accipere! Propter testimonia inquit _quae de Christo praefati sunt._Ego quidem nulla inveni, quamvis attentius eos et curiosissime legerim. Sed tamen et hoc enervis fidei confessio est in Christum sine teste et argumento non credere. Nempe ipsi vos docere soletis idcirco nihil esse curiosius exquirendum, quia simpex sit et absoluta christiana credulitas. Quomodo ergo nunc fidei simplicitatem destruitis indiciis eam ac testibus fulciendo et hoc Iudaeis? Aut si prima vobis sententia displicet idcircoque transistis in alteram, quis fidelior vobis esse testis debet quam deus ipse de filio suo, qui non per vatem nec per interpretem, sed ultro caelitus erupta voce, cum eum mitteret ad terram, dixit: Hic est filius meus dilectissimus, credite illi!, p. 329,13 nenon et ipse de se: A patre meo processi et veni in hunc mundum atque multa alia huiusmodi, ad quae ringentes Iudaei: Tu de te testificaris dicebant, testimonium tuum non est verum, quibus ipse: Etsi ego testificor de me, testimonium meum verum est, quia non sum solus. Nam et in lege vestra scriptum est:‛Duorum hominum testimonium verum est’; ego sum, qui testificor de me, et testificatur de me, qui me misit pater. Non dixit: Prophetae. Ad haec et opera ipsa sua sibi in testimonium vocat, si mihi non creditis dicens operibus credite! Non dixit: Si mihi non creditis, prophetis credite. Quapropter nos testimoniis de salvatore nostro nullis egemus; exempla tantum vitae honestae et prudentiam ac virtutem in prophetis quaerimus, quorum nihil in Iudaeorum fuisse vatibus, quia te non latuerit, sentio, siquidem consulente me, cur eos accipiendos putares, non improuide nec inurbaniter silentio eorum mandatis operibus in sola transiluisti praesagia, oblitus utique scriptum esse numquam vindemiari uvam de spinis nec de tribulis ficus. p. 330,7 Quapropter haec strictim interim et castigate ad interrogationem tuam responderim, quia quaeris, cur non accipiamus prophetas; alioquin nihil eos de Christo prophetasse abunde iam parentum nostrorum libris ostensum est. Ego vero illud adiciam, quia si Hebraici vates Christum scientes et praedicantes tam flagitiose vixerunt, iure et in ipsos dici poterit id, quod Paulus de gentium sapientibus contestatur: p. 330,14 Quia cum cognovissent deum, non ut deum clarificaverunt aut gratias egerunt, sed evanuerunt in cogitationibus suis et intenebratum est insipiens cor eorum. Vides ergo non esse magnum magna cognovisse, nisi ex eorum vixeris dignitate.

Traduction Masquer
Reply to Faustus the Manichaean

1.

Faustus said: Why do I not believe the prophets? Rather why do you believe them? On account, you will reply, of their prophecies about Christ. For my part, I have read the prophets with the most eager attention, and have found no such prophecies. And surely it shows a weak faith not to believe in Christ without proofs and testimonies. Indeed, you yourselves are accustomed to teach that Christian faith is so simple and absolute as not to admit of laborious investigations. Why, then, should you destroy the simplicity of faith by buttressing it with evidences, and Jewish evidences too? Or if you are changing your opinion about evidences, what more trustworthy witness could you have than God Himself testifying to His own Son when He sent Him on earth,--not by a prophet or an interpreter,--by a voice immediately from heaven: "This is my beloved Son, believe Him?" ¹ And again He testifies of Himself: "I came forth from the Father, and am come into the world;" ² and in many similar passages. When the Jews quarrelled with this testimony, saying "Thou bearest witness of thyself, thy witness is not true," He replied: "Although I bear witness of myself, my witness is true. It is written in your law, The witness of two men is true. I am one that bear witness of myself, and the Father who sent me beareth witness of me." ³ He does not mention the prophets. Again He appeals to the testimony of His own works, saying, "If ye believe not me, believe the works;" ⁴ not, "If ye believe not me, believe the prophets." Accordingly we require no testimonies concerning our Saviour. All we look for in the prophets is prudence and virtue, and a good example, which, you are well aware, are not to be found in the Jewish prophets. This, no doubt, explains your referring me at once to their predictions as a reason for believing them, without a word about their actions. This may be good policy, but it is not in harmony with the declaration of Scripture, that it is impossible to gather grapes from thorns, or figs from thistles. This may serve meanwhile as a brief and sufficient reply to the question, why we do not believe the prophets. The fact that they did not prophesy of Christ is abundantly proved in the writings of our fathers. I shall only add this, that if the Hebrew prophets knew and preached Christ, and yet lived such vicious lives, what Paul says of the wise men among the Gentiles might be applied to them: "Though they knew God, they glorified Him not as God, nor were thankful; but they became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened." ⁵ You see the knowledge of great things is worth little, unless the life corresponds.