24.
As we have made mention of that distinguished saint, let us show also from his Apocalypse that repentance unaccompanied by baptism ought to be allowed valid in the case of heretics. It is imputed ( Rev. ii. 4 ) to the angel of Ephesus that he has forsaken his first love. In the angel of the Church of Pergamum the eating of idol-sacrifices is censured ( Rev. ii. 14 ), and the doctrine of the Nicolaitans ( ib. 15 ). Likewise the angel of Thyatira is rebuked ( ib. 20 ) on account of Jezebel the prophetess, and the idol meats, and fornication. And yet the Lord encourages all these to repent, and adds a threat, moreover, of future punishment if they do not turn. Now he would not urge them to repent unless he intended to grant pardon P. 333 to the penitents. Is there any indication of his having said, Let them be re-baptized who have been baptized in the faith of the Nicolaitans? or let hands be laid upon those of the people of Pergamum who at that time believed, having held the doctrine of Balaam? Nay, rather, “Repent therefore,” 1 he says, “or else I come to thee quickly, and I will make war against them with the sword of my mouth.”
Rev. ii. 16 . ↩
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ab60e/ab60ea1b1c35d432df2d8e2df8e555a55a872aa0" alt="pattern"