24.
But at the hour of the salutation the priests went away, and Zacharias did not come forth to meet them with a blessing, according to his custom. 1 And the priests stood waiting for Zacharias to salute him at the prayer, 2 and to glorify the Most High. And he still delaying, they were all afraid. But one of them ventured to go in, and he saw clotted blood beside the altar; and he heard a voice saying: Zacharias has been murdered, and his blood shall not be wiped up until his avenger come. And hearing this saying, he was afraid, and went out and told it to the priests. And they ventured in, and saw what had happened; and the fretwork of the temple made a wailing noise, and they rent their clothes 3 from the top even to the bottom. And they found not his body, but they found his blood turned into stone. And they were afraid, and went out and reported to the people that Zacharias had been murdered. And all the tribes of the people heard, and mourned, and lamented for him three days and three nights. And after the three days, the priests consulted as to whom they should put in his place; and the lot fell upon Simeon. For it was he who had been warned by the Holy Spirit that he should not see death until he should see the Christ in the flesh. 4
And I James that wrote this history in Jerusalem, a commotion having arisen when Herod died, withdrew myself to the wilderness until the commotion in Jerusalem ceased, glorifying the Lord God, who had given me the gift and the wisdom to write this history. 5 And grace shall be with them that fear our Lord Jesus Christ, to whom be glory to ages of ages. Amen. 6
Lit., the blessing of Zacharias did not come forth, etc. ↩
Or, with prayer. ↩
Another reading is: And was rent from the top, etc. ↩
Luke ii. 26. One of the mss. here adds Matt. ii. 19-23, with two or three verbal changes. ↩
[Assuming that this is among the most ancient of the Apocryphal Gospels, it is noteworthy that the writer abstains from elaborating his statements on points fully narrated in the Canonical Gospels. The supplementary character of the earliest of these writings is obvious. But what a contrast between the impressive silence of the New Testament narratives, and the garrulity, not to say indelicacy, of these detailed descriptions of the Nativity!--R.] ↩
The mss. vary much in the doxology. ↩
