Chapter XXXVII.--Other Turgid and Ridiculous Theories About the Origin of the Aeons and Creation, Stated and Condemned.
Now listen to some other buffooneries 1 of a master who is a great swell among them, 2 and who has pronounced his dicta with an even priestly authority. They run thus: There comes, says he, before all things Pro-arche, the inconceivable, and indescribable, and nameless, which I for my own part call Monotes (Solitude). With this was associated another power, to which also I give the name of Henotes (Unity). Now, inasmuch as Monotes and Henotes--that is to say, Solitude and Union--were only one being, they produced, and yet not in the way of production, 3 the intellectual, innascible, invisible beginning of all things, which human language 4 has called Monad (Solitude). 5 This has inherent in itself a consubstantial force, which it calls Unity 6 These powers, accordingly, Solitude or Solitariness, and Unity, or Union, propagated all the other emanations of Aeons. 7 Wonderful distinction, to be sure! Whatever change Union and Unity may undergo, Solitariness and Solitude is profoundly supreme. Whatever designation you give the power, it is one and the same.
-
Oehler gives good reasons for the reading "ingenia circulatoria," instead of the various readings of other editors. ↩
-
Insignioris apud eos magistri. ↩
-
Non proferentes. Another reading is "non proserentes" (not generating). ↩
-
Sermo. ↩
-
Or, solitariness. ↩
-
Or, Union. ↩
-
Compare our Irenaeus, I. 2, 3. [Vol. I. p. 316.] ↩