35.
These points we have found it necessary first to examine, that, when we see Him doing or saying aught divinely through the instrument 1 of His own body, we may know that He so works, being God, and also, if we see Him speaking or suffering humanly, we may not be ignorant that He bore flesh and became man, and hence He so acts and so speaks. For if we recognise what is proper to each, and see and understand that both these things and those are done by One 2, we are right in our faith, and shall never stray. But if a man looking at what is done divinely by the Word, deny the body, or looking at what is proper to the body, deny the Word’s presence in the flesh, or from what is human entertain low thoughts concerning the Word, such a one, as a Jewish vintner 3, mixing water with the wine, shall account the Cross an offence, or as a Gentile, will deem the preaching folly. This then is what happens to God’s enemies the Arians; for looking at what is human in the Saviour, they have judged Him a creature. Therefore they ought, looking also at the divine works of the Word, to deny 4 the origination of His body, and henceforth to rank themselves with Manichees 5. But for them, learn they, however tardily, that ‘the Word became flesh;’ and let us, retaining the general scope 6 of the faith, acknowledge that what they interpret ill, has a right interpretation 7.
Chapter XXVII.—Texts Explained; Tenthly, Matthew xi. 27 ; John iii. 35 , &c.These texts intended to preclude the Sabellian notion of the Son; they fall in with the Catholic doctrine concerning the Son; they are explained by ‘so’ inJohn v. 26. (Anticipation of the next chapter.) Again they are used with reference to our Lord’s human nature; for our sake, that we might receive and not lose, as receiving in Him. And consistently with other parts of Scripture, which shew that He had the power, &c., before He received it. He was God and man, and His actions are often at once divine and human.
35 (continued). For, ‘The Father loveth the Son, and hath given all things into His hand;’ and, ‘All things were given unto Me of My Father;’ and, ‘I can do nothing of Myself, but as I hear, I judge 8;’ and the like passages do not shew that the Son once had not these prerogatives—(for had not He eternally what the Father has, who is the Only Word and Wisdom of the Father in essence, who also says, ‘All that the Father hath are Mine 9,’ and what are Mine, are the Father’s? for if the things of the Father are the Son’s and the Father hath them ever, it is plain that what the Son hath, being the Father’s, were ever in the Son),—not then because once He had them not, did He say this, but because, whereas the Son hath eternally what He hath, yet He hath them from the Father.
Cf. 31, n. 10. ↩
Vid.infr.39–41. and 56, n. 7. Cf. Procl.ad Armen.p. 615. Leo’s Tome (Ep.28, 3) also Hil.Trin.ix. 11 fin. ‘Vagit infans, sed in cœlo est, &c.’ ibid. x. 54. Ambros.de Fid.ii. 77. Erat vermis in cruce sed dimittebat peccata. Non habebat speciem, sed plenitudinem divinitatis, &c. Id.Epist.i. 46, n. 5. Theoph.Ep. Pasch.6. ap.Conc. Ephes.p. 1404. Hard. ↩
Vid. Is. i. 22 , LXX.;Or.ii. 80;de Decr.10. ↩
Thus heresies arepartialviews of the truth, starting from some truth which they exaggerate, and disowning and protesting against other truth, which they fancy inconsistent with it. vid.supr. Or.i. 26, n. 2. ↩
De Syn.33;Or.i. 8. ↩
Cf. §28, n. 11. ↩
Cf. §30, n. 7. ↩
John iii. 35 ; Matt. xi. 27 ; John v. 30 ↩
John xvi. 15 ; xvii. 10. ↩
