47.
If then for our sake He sanctifies Himself, and does this when He is become man, it is very plain that the Spirit’s descent on Him in Jordan was a descent upon us, because of His bearing our body. And it did not take place for promotion to the Word, but again for our sanctification, that we might share His anointing, and of us it might be said, ‘Know ye not that ye are God’s Temple, and the Spirit of God dwelleth in you 1?’ For when the Lord, as man, was washed in Jordan, it was we who were washed in Him and by Him 2. And when He received the Spirit, we it was who by Him were made recipients of It. And moreover for this reason, not as Aaron or P. 334 David or the rest, was He anointed with oil, but in another way above all His fellows, ‘with the oil of gladness,’ which He Himself interprets to be the Spirit, saying by the Prophet, ‘The Spirit of the Lord is upon Me, because the Lord hath anointed Me 3;’ as also the Apostle has said, ‘How God anointed Him with the Holy Ghost. 4’ When then were these things spoken of Him but when He came in the flesh and was baptized in Jordan, and the Spirit descended on Him? And indeed the Lord Himself said, ‘The Spirit shall take of Mine;’ and ‘I will send Him;’ and to His disciples, ‘Receive ye the Holy Ghost 5.’ And notwithstanding, He who, as the Word and Radiance of the Father, gives to others, now is said to be sanctified, because now He has become man, and the Body that is sanctified is His. From Him then we have begun to receive the unction and the seal, John saying, ‘And ye have an unction from the Holy One;’ and the Apostle, ‘And ye were sealed with the Holy Spirit of promise 6.’ Therefore because of us and for us are these words. What advance then of promotion, and reward of virtue or generally of conduct, is proved from this in our Lord’s instance? For if He was not God, and then had become God, if not being King He was preferred to the Kingdom, your reasoning would have had some faint plausibility. But if He is God and the throne of His kingdom is everlasting, in what way could God advance? or what was there wanting to Him who was sitting on His Father’s throne? And if, as the Lord Himself has said, the Spirit is His, and takes of His, and He sends It, it is not the Word, considered as the Word and Wisdom, who is anointed with the Spirit which He Himself gives, but the flesh assumed by Him which is anointed in Him and by Him 7; that the sanctification coming to the Lord as man, may come to all men from Him. For not of Itself, saith He, doth the Spirit speak, but the Word is He who gives It to the worthy. For this is like the passage considered above; for as the Apostle has written, ‘Who existing in form of God thought it not a prize to be equal with God, but emptied Himself, and took a servant’s form,’ so David celebrates the Lord, as the everlasting God and King, but sent to us and assuming our body which is mortal. For this is his meaning in the Psalm, ‘All thy garments 8 smell of myrrh, aloes, and cassia;’ and it is represented by Nicodemus and by Mary’s company, when the one came bringing ‘a mixture of myrrh and aloes, about an hundred pounds weight;’ and the others 9‘the spices which they had prepared’ for the burial of the Lord’s body.
1 Cor. iii. 16 . ↩
Pusey on Baptism, 2nd Ed. pp. 275–293. ↩
Isai. lxi. 1 . ↩
Acts x. 38 . ↩
John xvi. 14, 7 ; xx. 22. ↩
1 John ii. 20 ; Eph. i. 13 . ↩
Elsewhere Athan. says that our Lord’s Godhead was the immediate anointing or chrism of the manhood He assumed,in Apollin.ii. 3,Orat.iv. §36. vid. Origen.Periarch.ii. 6. n. 4. And S. Greg. Naz. still more expressly, and from the same text as Athan.Orat.x. fin. Again, ‘This [the Godhead] is the anointing of the manhood, not sanctifying by an energy as the other Christs [anointed] but by a presence of Him whole who anointed, ὅλου τοῦ χρίοντος ; whence it came to pass that what anointed was called man and what was anointed was made God.’Orat.xxx. 20. Damasc.F. O.iii. 3. Dei Filius, sicut pluvia in vellus, toto divinitatis unguento nostram se fudit in carnem. Chrysolog.Serm.60. It is more common, however, to consider that the anointing was the descent of the Spirit, as Athan. says at the beginning of this section, according to Luke iv. 18 ; Acts x. 38 . ↩
Ps. xlv. 8 . Our Lord’s manhood is spoken of as a garment; more distinctly afterwards, ‘As Aaron was himself, and did not change on putting round him the high priest’s garment, but remaining the same, was but clothed,’ &c,Orat.ii. 8. On the Apollinarian abuse of the idea, vid. notein loc. ↩
John xix. 39 ; Luke xxiv. 1 . ↩
