54.
For it is written, ‘So much better than P. 338 the Angels;’ let us then first examine this. Now it is right and necessary, as in all divine Scripture, so here, faithfully to expound the time of which the Apostle wrote, and the person 1, and the point; lest the reader, from ignorance missing either these or any similar particular, may be wide of the true sense. This understood that inquiring eunuch, when he thus besought Philip, ‘I pray thee, of whom doth the Prophet speak this? of himself, or of some other man 2?’ for he feared lest, expounding the lesson unsuitably to the person, he should wander from the right sense. And the disciples, wishing to learn the time of what was foretold, besought the Lord, ‘Tell us,’ said they, ‘when shall these things be? and what is the sign of Thy coming 3?’ And again, hearing from the Saviour the events of the end, they desired to learn the time of it, that they might be kept from error themselves, and might be able to teach others; as, for instance, when they had learned, they set right the Thessalonians 4, who were going wrong. When then one knows properly these points, his understanding of the faith is right and healthy; but if he mistakes any such points, forthwith he falls into heresy. Thus Hymenæus and Alexander and their fellows 5 were beside the time, when they said that the resurrection had already been; and the Galatians were after the time, in making much of circumcision now. And to miss the person was the lot of the Jews, and is still, who think that of one of themselves is said, ‘Behold, the Virgin shall conceive, and bear a Son, and they shall call his Name Emmanuel, which is being interpreted, God with us 6;’ and that, ‘A prophet shall the Lord your God raise up to you 7,’ is spoken of one of the Prophets; and who, as to the words, ‘He was led as a sheep to the slaughter 8,’ instead of learning from Philip, conjecture them spoken of Isaiah or some other of the former Prophets 9.
De Decr.14, note 2. ↩
Acts viii. 34 . ↩
Matt. xxiv. 3 . ↩
Vid. 1 Thess. iv. 13; 2 Thess. ii. 1 , &c. ↩
2 Tim. ii. 17, 18 ; 1 Tim. i. 20 . ↩
Is. vii. 14 ; Matt. i. 23 . ↩
Deut. xviii. 15 . ↩
Is. liii. 7 . ↩
The more common evasion on the part of the Jews was to interpret the prophecy of their own sufferings in captivity. It was an idea of Grotius that the prophecy received a first fulfilment in Jeremiah. vid. JustinTryph.72 et al., Iren.Hær.iv. 33. Tertull. inJud.9, Cyprian.Testim. in Jud.ii. 13, Euseb.Dem.iii. 2, &c. [cf. Driver and Neubauer Jewish commentaries on Is. lii. and Is. liii. and Introduction to English Translation of these pp. xxxvii. sq.] ↩
